1983) (broad discovery can serve as a substitute for the "trial preparation" function of a bill of particulars). Rather, courts have taken into account other sources of information provided by the government, including discovery materials. In analyzing requests for a bill of particulars or information to be disclosed in one, courts have not confined themselves to the indictment or to the government's voluntary bill, if provided. Where the indictment itself and the bill of particulars supplied by the government provide the defendant with adequate information with which to conduct his defense, additional requests for particulars should be denied. See also Davis, 582 F.2d at 951 ("generalized discovery is not a permissible goal of a bill of particulars"). 962 (1979).Ī bill of particulars should not be expanded into a device to circumvent the restrictions on pretrial discovery of specific evidence contained in Fed. The general purposes of a bill of particulars are to inform the defendant of the charges against him with sufficient precision to: (1) enable him to prepare his defense, (2) obviate surprise at trial, and (3) enable him to plead his acquittal or conviction in the case as a bar to subsequent prosecution for the same offense. 7(f) provides, in part, that "he court may direct the filing of a bill of particulars." The decision whether to grant or deny a bill of particulars is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. Accordingly, there is no need for a formal bill of particulars in this case and therefore the defendant's Motion should be denied. In addition, this Response voluntarily provides defendant with further details regarding the Indictment. The Indictment in the case and the extensive discovery to be afforded the defendant prior to trial will be sufficient to fully apprise him of the charges pending against him and to enable him to prepare for trial. The United States of America, through its undersigned attorney, hereby responds to Defendant's Motion for Bill of Particulars. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group. To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. The company said that the board also approved the formulation and implementation of ‘FSN E-Commerce Ventures Limited – Employee Stock Option Plan 2022’ (“ESOP 2022”) for the grant of Employee Stock Options to Eligible Employees of the Company and its group companies including the subsidiary companies or associate companies of the Company, subject to shareholders’ approval by way of postal ballot.This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). It also said that the board also approved re-classification of the Authorized Share Capital from Rs 325 Crore comprising of 275 Crore Equity Shares of Re 1 each and 50 Crore Preference Shares of Rs 1 each to Rs 325 Crore comprising of 325 Crore Equity Shares of Re 1 each and the consequent amendment to the 5th Clause of the Memorandum of Association of the Company, subject to shareholders’ approval by way of postal ballot. Also Read: Suzlon Energy founder and CMD Tulsi Tanti dead, company to continue with rights issue opening next week
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |